Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/439
Título: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): where are we going? A bibliometric assessment.
Autor: Autorino, R
Yakoubi, R
White, WM
Gettman, M
De Sio, M
Quattrone, C
Di Palma, C
Izzo, A
Correia-Pinto, J
Kaouk, JH
Lima, E
Palavras-chave: Cirurgia Endoscópica Transluminal por Orifícios Naturais
Data: 2013
Editora: Elsevier
Citação: BJU Int. 2013;111(1):11-6.
Resumo: The aim of this study was to analyse natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)-related publications over the last 5 years. A systematic literature search was done to retrieve publications related to NOTES from 2006 to 2011. The following variables were recorded: year of publication; article type; study design; setting; Journal Citation Reports® journal category; authors area of surgical speciality; geographic area of origin; surgical procedure; NOTES technique; NOTES access route; number of clinical cases. A time-trend analysis was performed by comparing early (2006-2008) and late (2009-2011) study periods. Overall, 644 publications were included in the analysis and most papers were found in general surgery journals (50.9%). Studies were most frequently clinical series (43.9%) and animal experimental (48%), with the articles focusing primarily on cholecystectomy, access creation and closure, and peritoneoscopy. Pure NOTES techniques were performed in most of the published reports (85%) with the remaining cases being hybrid NOTES (7.4%) and NOTES-assisted procedures (6.1%). The access routes included transgastric (52.5%), transcolonic (12.3%), transvesical (12.5%), transvaginal (10.5%), and combined (12.3%). From the early to the late period, there was a significant increase in the number of randomised controlled trials (5.6% vs 7.2%) or non-randomised but comparative studies (5.6% vs 22.9%) (P < 0.001) and there was also a significant increase in the number of colorectal procedures and nephrectomies (P = 0.002). Pure NOTES remained the most studied approach over the years but with increased investigation in the field of NOTES-assisted techniques (P = 0.001). There was also a significant increase in the adoption of transvesical access (7% vs 15.6%) (P = 0.007). NOTES is in a developmental stage and much work is still needed to refine techniques, verify safety and document efficacy. Since the first description of the concept of NOTES, >2000 clinical cases, irrespective of specialty, have been reported. NOTES remains a field of intense clinical and experimental research in various surgical specialities
Peer review: yes
URI: http://comum.rcaap.pt/handle/123456789/4391
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/439
Aparece nas colecções:HB - UR - Artigos
HB - CIR PED - Artigos

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
BJUI.pdf195,27 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.