HB - Oftalmologia
Permanent URI for this community
Browse
Browsing HB - Oftalmologia by Author "Ambrósio, R"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Application of different Scheimpflug-based lens densitometry methods in phacodynamics predictionPublication . Faria-Correia, F; Lopes, BT; Ramos, IC; Monteiro, T; Franqueira, N; Ambrósio, RPURPOSE: To evaluate the correlations between preoperative Scheimpflug-based lens densitometry metrics and phacodynamics. METHODS: The Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III) was used to grade nuclear opalescence (NO), along with different methods of lens densitometry evaluation (absolute scale from 0% to 100%): three-dimensional (3D), linear, and region of interest (ROI) modes. Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and total ultrasound (US) time were recorded and correlated with the different methods of cataract grading. Significant correlations were evaluated using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients according to data normality. RESULTS: A positive correlation was detected between the NO score and the average density and the maximum density derived from the 3D mode (r=0.624, P<0.001; r=0.619, P<0.001, respectively) and the ROI mode (r=0.600, P<0.001; r=0.642, P<0.001, respectively). Regarding the linear mode, only the average density parameter presented a significant relationship with the NO score (r=0.569, P<0.001). The 3D-derived average density and maximum density were positively correlated with CDE (rho =0.682, P<0.001; rho =0.683, P<0.001, respectively) and total US time (rho =0.631 and rho =0.668, respectively). There was a linear relationship between the average density and maximum density of the ROI mode and CDE (rho =0.686, P<0.001; rho =0.598, P<0.001, respectively) and total US time (rho =0.642 and rho =0.644, respectively). The average density was the only parameter derived from the linear mode that showed a significant correlation with CDE (rho =0.522, P<0.001) and total US time (rho =0.450, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Specific Scheimpflug-derived densitometric parameters of the nucleus correlated with phacoemulsification parameters. The use of the appropriate densitometry approach can predict more efficiently the phacodynamics.
- Corneal biomechanics: Where are we?Publication . Luz, A; Faria-Correia, F; Salomão, MQ; Lopes, BT; Ambrósio, R
- Scheimpflug lens densitometry and ocular wavefront aberrations in patients with mild nuclear cataractPublication . Faria-Correia, F; Lopes, B; Monteiro, T; Franqueira, NC; Ambrósio, RPURPOSE: To test correlations between Scheimpflug optical densitometry and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in patients with mild nuclear cataract. SETTING: Cornea and Refractive Surgery Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center study. METHODS: In eyes with mild nuclear cataract, lens densitometry was evaluated by Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR), which provided an objective quantification (mean density and maximum density) and grading (nuclear staging score) of the crystalline lens. A visual function analyzer that combines ray-tracing aberrometry and Placido disk-based topography (iTrace) was used to evaluate the total ocular and internal HOAs. RESULTS: The study comprised 40 eyes of 30 patients. The mean density of the lens nucleus was 8.99% ± 0.76% (SD) (range 7.5% to 10.8%), and the mean maximum density was 27.96% ± 6.97% (range 16.9% to 56.1%). Regarding the score of nuclear staging of the Scheimpflug device, 28 eyes had level 0 and 12 eyes had level 1. Significant positive correlations were found between the mean density and maximum density parameters and the internal HOAs (ρ = 0.661, P < .001 and ρ = 0.570, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant correlations between the quantification parameters derived from Scheimpflug lens densitometry and ocular HOAs. The integration of these technologies can help in clinical decision making and in understanding the subjective symptoms of patients with mild nuclear cataracts. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Ambrósio is a consultant to Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Alcon Surgical, Inc., and Carl Zeiss Meditec AG. None of the other authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.