Browsing by Author "Rolanda, C"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 44
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Acute Treatment of Malignant Colorectal Occlusion: Real Life PracticePublication . Fernandes, D; Domingues, S; Gonçalves, BM; Bastos, P; Ferreira, A; Rodrigues, A; Gonçalves, R; Lopes, L; Rolanda, CINTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer presents itself as acute bowel occlusion in 10-40% of patients. There are two main therapeutic approaches: urgent surgery and endoluminal placement self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS). AIMS AND METHODS: This study intended to better clarify the risk/benefit ratio of the above-mentioned approaches. We conducted a retrospective longitudinal multicenter study, including 189 patients with acute malignant colorectal occlusion, diagnosed between January 2005 and March 2013. RESULTS: Globally (85 patients - 35 bridge-to-surgery and 50 palliative), SEMS's technical success was of 94%. Palliative SEMS had limited clinical success (60%) and were associated with 40% of complications. SEMS occlusion (19%) was the most frequent complication, followed by migration (9%) and bowel perforation (7%). Elective surgery after stenting was associated with a higher frequency of primary anastomosis (94% vs. 76%; p = 0.038), and a lower rate of colostomy (26% vs. 55%; p = 0.004) and overall mortality (31% vs. 57%; p = 0.02). However, no significant differences were identified concerning postoperative complications. Regarding palliative treatment, no difference was found in the complications rate and overall mortality between SEMS and decompressive colostomy/ileostomy. In this SEMS subgroup, we found a higher rate of reinterventions (40% vs. 5%; p = 0.004) and a longer hospital stay (14, nine vs. seven, three days; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: SEMS placement as a bridge-to-surgery should be considered in the acute treatment of colorectal malignant occlusion, since it displays advantages regarding primary anastomosis, colostomy rate and overall mortality. In contrast, in this study, palliative SEMS did not appear to present significant advantages when compared to decompressive colostomy.
- An uncommon diagnosis done by colonoscopyPublication . Costa, RS; Costa, JM; Ferreira, A; Gonçalves, R; Rolanda, C
- Ceacum-ilio-cutaneous fistula. A rare complication of urinary tuberculosisPublication . Cabral-Ribeiro, J; Rolanda, C; Santos, A
- Colecistectomia Videolaparoscópica Transumbilical Single Site com Equipamento de Laparoscopia ConvencionalPublication . Rolanda, Cartigo intitulado Colecistectomia videolaparoscópica transumbilical (single site) com equipamento de laparoscopia convencional recentemente publicado por Alves Júnior e colaboradores mereceu-nos atenção e algumas considerações que gostaria de partilhar. Embora aborde uma temática tradicionalmente adstrita à Cirurgia Geral, vale a pena revisitar alguns conceitos e perceber o contexto actual da cirurgia minimamente invasiva (MIS), onde também temos lugar enquanto gastrenterologistas.
- Colonoscopic findings in a true screening program for colorectal cancer (without previous fecal occult blood testing): the firts 500 proceduresPublication . Soares, J; Lopes, S; Gonçalves, R; Ferreira, A; Pereira, P; Rolanda, C; Machado, A; Macedo, G
- A Different Kind of Colon PolypsPublication . Ferreira, A; Gonçalves, R; Rolanda, C
- Diffuse Hepatic Metastasis—Or Not?Publication . Ferreira, A; Pereira, P; Rolanda, C
- Early precut fistulotomy for biliary access: time to change the paradigm of "the later, the better?Publication . Lopes, L; Dinis-Ribeiro, M; Rolanda, CBACKGROUND: The precut timing during the biliary cannulation algorithm is a subject of controversy. Some studies suggest that early institution of precut is a safe and effective strategy even though the extent to which this approach may affect the duration of the ERCP is seldom addressed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the success, safety, and procedure duration of an early precut fistulotomy (group A) versus a classic precut strategy after a difficult biliary cannulation (group B). DESIGN: Single-center, prospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 350 patients with a naïve papilla. INTERVENTIONS: Standard biliary cannulation followed by needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Biliary cannulation rate, NKF success, adverse events, and ERCP duration. RESULTS: The overall cannulation rate was similar, at 96% and 94% for groups A and B, respectively. The adverse event rate was 6.2% and 6.4%, respectively, with pancreatitis as the most frequent adverse event (group A, 3.9%; group B, 5.2%). The mean ERCP duration was, however, significantly shorter in group A, both when biliary cannulation was achieved without precutting (14 minutes vs 25 minutes, P < .001) as well as when biliary cannulation was attempted after NKF (18 minutes vs 31 minutes, P < .0001). LIMITATIONS: Single-center study design, referral center. CONCLUSIONS: If the endoscopist is experienced in ERCP and precut techniques, an early precut strategy should be the preferred cannulation strategy because this approach is as safe and effective as the late fistulotomy approach and substantially reduces ERCP duration.
- Emergencies after endoscopic proceduresPublication . Rolanda, C; Caetano, AC; Dinis-Ribeiro, MEndoscopy adverse events (AEs), or complications, are a rising concern on the quality of endoscopic care, given the technical advances and the crescent complexity of therapeutic procedures, over the entire gastrointestinal and bilio-pancreatic tract. In a small percentage, not established, there can be real emergency conditions, as perforation, severe bleeding, embolization or infection. Distinct variables interfere in its occurrence, although, the awareness of the operator for their potential, early recognition, and local organized facilities for immediate handling, makes all the difference in the subsequent outcome. This review outlines general AEs' frequencies, important predisposing factors and putative prophylactic measures for specific procedures (from conventional endoscopy to endoscopic cholangio-pancreatography and ultrasonography), with comprehensive approaches to the management of emergent bleeding and perforation.
- Endoscopic closure of transmural bladder wall perforationsPublication . Lima, E; Rolanda, C; Osório, L; Pêgo, JM; Silva, D; Henriques-Coelho, T; Carvalho, JL; Bergström, M; Park, PO; Mosse, CA; Swain, P; Correia-Pinto, JBACKGROUND: Traditionally, intraperitoneal bladder perforations caused by trauma or iatrogenic interventions have been treated by open or laparoscopic surgery. Additionally, transvesical access to the peritoneal cavity has been reported to be feasible and useful for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) but would be enhanced by a reliable method of closing the vesicotomy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of an endoscopic closure method for vesical perforations using a flexible, small-diameter endoscopic suturing kit in a survival porcine model. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This pilot study was performed at the University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, using six anesthetized female pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Closure of a full-thickness longitudinal incision in the bladder dome (up to 10 mm in four animals and up to 20 mm in two animals) with the endoscopic suturing kit using one to three absorbable stitches. MEASUREMENTS: The acute quality of sealing was immediately tested by distending the bladder with methylene-blue dye under laparoscopic control (in two animals). Without a bladder catheter, the animals were monitored daily for 2 wk, and a necropsy examination was performed to check for the signs of peritonitis, wound dehiscence, and quality of healing. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Endoscopic closure of bladder perforation was carried out easily and quickly in all animals. The laparoscopic view revealed no acute leak of methylene-blue dye after distension of the bladder. After recovery from anaesthesia, the pigs began to void normally, and no adverse event occurred. Postmortem examination revealed complete healing of vesical incision with no signs of infection or adhesions in the peritoneal cavity. No limitations have yet been studied clinically. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility and the safety of endoscopic closure of vesical perforations with an endoscopic suturing kit in a survival porcine model. This study provides support for further studies using endoscopic closure of the bladder which may lead to a new era in management of bladder rupture and adoption of the transvesical port in NOTES procedures.